Shinken’s distributed architecture with realms

Multi customers and/or sites: REALMS

Shinken’s architecture like we saw allows us to have a unique administration and data location. All pollers the hosts are cut and sent to schedulers, and the pollers take jobs from all schedulers. Every one is happy.

Every one? In fact no. If an administrator got a continental distributed architecture he can have serious problems. If the architecture is common to multiple customers network, a customer A scheduler can have a customer B poller that asks him jobs. It’s not a good solution. Even with distributed network, distant pollers should not ask jobs to schedulers in the other continent, it’s not network efficient.

That is where the site/customers management is useful. In Shinken, it’s managed by the realms.

A realm is a group of resources that will manage hosts or hostgroups. Such a link will be unique: a host cannot be in multiple realms. If you put a hostgroup in a realm, all hosts in this group will be in the realm (unless a host already has the realm set, the host value will be taken).

A realm is:

  • at least a scheduler
  • at least a poller
  • can have a reactionner
  • can have a broker

In a realm, all realm pollers will take all realm schedulers jobs.


Very important: there is only ONE arbiter (and a spare of course) for ALL realms. The arbiter manages all realms and all that is inside.


A realm can have sub-realms. It doesn’t change anything for schedulers, but it can be useful for other satellites and spares. Reactionners and brokers are linked to a realm, but they can take jobs from all sub-realms too. This way you can have less reactionners and brokers (like we soon will see).

The fact that reactionners/brokers (and in fact pollers too) can take jobs from sub-schedulers is decided by the presence of the manage_sub_realms parameter. For pollers the default value is 0, but it’s 1 for reactionners/brokers.

An example

To make it simple: you put hosts and/or hostgroups in a realm. This last one is to be considered as a resources pool. You don’t need to touch the host/hostgroup definition if you need more/less performances in the realm or if you want to add a new satellites (a new reactionner for example).

Realms are a way to manage resources. They are the smaller clouds in your global cloud infrastructure :)

If you do not need this feature, that’s not a problem, it’s optional. There will be a default realm created and every one will be put into.

It’s the same for hosts that don’t have a realm configured: they will be put in the realm that has the “default” parameter.

Picture example

Diagrams are good :)

Let’s take two examples of distributed architectures around the world. In the first case, the administrator don’t want to share resources between realms. They are distinct. In the second, the reactionners and brokers are shared with all realms (so all notifications are send from a unique place, and so is all data).

Here is the isolated one:


And a more common way of sharing reactionner/broker:


Like you can see, all elements are in a unique realm. That’s the sub-realm functionality used for reactionner/broker.

Configuration of the realms

Here is the configuration for the shared architecture:

define realm {
 realm_name       All
 realm_members    Europe,US,Asia
 default          1    ;Is the default realm. Should be unique!

define realm{
 realm_name       Europe
 realm_members    Paris   ;This realm is IN Europe

An now the satellites:

define scheduler{
 scheduler_name       scheduler_Paris
 realm                Paris             ;It will only manage Paris hosts

define reactionner{
 reactionner_name     reactionner-master
 realm                All                ;Will reach ALL schedulers

And in host/hostgroup definition:

define host{
 host_name         server-paris
 realm             Paris         ;Will be put in the Paris realm

define hostgroups{
 hostgroup_name               linux-servers
 alias                        Linux Servers
 members                      srv1,srv2
 realm                        Europe       ;Will be put in the Europe realm

Multi levels brokers

In the previous samples, if you put numerous brokers into the realm, each scheduler will have only one broker at the same time. It was also impossible to have a common Broker in All, and one brokers in each sub-realms.

You can activate multi-brokers features with a realm parameter, the broker_complete_links option (0 by default).

You will have to enable this option in ALL your realms! For example:

define realm{
 realm_name       Europe
 broker_complete_links  1

This will enable the fact that each scehduler will be linked with each brokers. This will make possible to have dedicated brokers in a same realm (one for WebUI, another for Graphite for example). It will also make possible to have a common Broker in “All”, and one broker in each of its sub-realms (Europe, US and Asia). Of course the sub-brokers will only see the data from their realms, and the sub-realms (like Paris for Europe for example).

Read the Docs v: 2.4.1
On Read the Docs
Project Home

Free document hosting provided by Read the Docs.